.gif) Les Cohortes Célestes ont le devoir et le regret de vous informer que Libres Propos est entré en sommeil. Ce forum convivial et sympathique reste uniquement accessible en lecture seule. Prenez plaisir à le consulter.
Merci de votre compréhension. |
|
| | Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise |  |
|
+10Shansaa jam Ungern Laogorus EddieCochran OmbreBlanche Le chanoine quantat Zed Biloulou 14 participants | |
| Auteur | Message |
|---|
Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/11/2008, 13:47 | |
| Rappel du premier message :Browse Newspapers by country
http://newsdirectory.com/
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Canada
United States
Oceania
South America
Resources
Breaking News
Business Newspapers
College Newspapers
Media Industry Associations
Metropolitan Daily Press
Searchable Archives
Coffee Break
Television
Broadcast TV Stations
Network News
TV Networks
Additional Research
City Governments
County Governments
Travel Planner
College Locator Browse Magazines by subject
Arts and Entertainment
Automotive
Business
Computer
Culture and Society
Current Issues
Health
Home
Industry Trade Publications
Pets and Animals
Religion
Science
Sports
Travel
. . . more subjects
Magazines by Region
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Oceania
South America
More |
| | | |
| Auteur | Message |
|---|
Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 4/9/2010, 17:18 | |
| On va faire plaisir aux gens de droite! More taunts to the Democratic base Emanuel drops another F-bomb on a progressive ally, while Alan Simpson blames some veterans for our budget woes Another day, another disappointment for progressive Democrats. We learn from former auto-industry car czar Steve Rattner that Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel said "Fuck the UAW" during tough takeover talks – just like he called progressives "fucking retarded" for contemplating primary challenges against conservative Democrats. >> ICI<< |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 4/9/2010, 20:09 | |
| Mitch McConnell, John Boehner And The Republicans' Blood Oath Against America
par: Richard Stitt
According to Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell and House minority leader John Boehner:
1. Americans don't want affordable health care for all citizens and they don't want to close the Medicare prescription drug Part D doughnut hole that requires seniors on fixed incomes to pay the full cost of the pharmaceutical industry's obscenely high drug prices.
2. Americans don't want to rid the Medicare Part D (totally unfunded by the way) mandate that forbids the federal government from negotiating lower prescription drug costs.
3. Americans don't want banking and finance reform which during the 8-year Bush-Cheney reign allowed the Wall Street hucksters and Ponzi scheme swindlers to run amok with no regulation or oversight.
4. Americans don't want the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest 2% of citizens to expire. The tax cuts, according to the non partisan Congressional Budget Office will allow the federal deficit to balloon by an additional $3 trillion.
5. Americans don't want to see a stop to the outsourcing of U.S. jobs to India, China, Bangladesh, Indonesia and other cheap labor countries.
6. Americans don't want to extend unemployment benefits to millions of out-of-work people who Republicans call "lazy bums" no matter how hard those jobless Americans are looking.
7. Americans don't want an end to the Bush-Cheney wars which enrich the powerful defense contractors. After all, Americans realize that Xe (once known as Blackwater) mercenary army doesn't want to be weaned off of the lucrative, no-bid, no-accountable government contracts that perpetuate the military industrial complex.
8. Americans don't want Social Security because the Republicans believe that it should "wither and die on the vine."
Of course, it is well-documented that they want to privatize it.
9. Americans don't want to prohibit health insurance companies from refusing and discriminating against citizens for preexisting illnesses and health conditions.
10. Americans don't want environmental regulations that protect the lives, health, security and welfare of the public.
11. Americans don't want any cuts in the bloated military industrial complex's $700 billion per year appropriations because it might reduce the numbers of retired generals and admirals who sit on the boards of defense contractors.
12. Americans don't want cuts in subsidies to corn-ethanol growers, Big Coal, Big Oil and their lobbyists who fight tooth and nail to kill all global warming and climate change legislation, spreading the lie that global warming is just a liberal myth.
Ethanol alone receives almost $6 billion per year in taxpayer subsidies that result in higher food costs and higher costs to feed livestock. Even though it is indisputable that ethanol is 25% less efficient as a fuel the lobbyists for Cargill and Archer Daniels Midland, the two behemoth agribusinesses that monopolize the market, have been successful in imposing a 54-cent per gallon tariff on the less expensive, more efficient Brazilian bio-fuel made from sugar cane.
13. Americans don't want fair and livable wages for their labor. They would rather work longer hours for less pay so that the pay gap between the affluent and the poor gets wider each year.
In two months we will know who the winners and losers will be: The McConnell/Boehner Republican Party of No and their Koch brothers-funded Tea Party spawn or the American people. |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 01:05 | |
|  Jan Brewer est-elle une menteuse pathologique?
« Gov. Jan Brewer said in a recent interview that her father died fighting Nazis in Germany. But in fact, the death of Wilford Drinkwine came 10 years after World War II had ended.
During the war, Drinkwine worked as a civilian supervisor for a naval munitions depot in Hawthorne, Nev. He died of lung disease in 1955 in California.» >>Brewer tells conflicting stories about dad's war effort<< |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2814 - Rahm Emanuel's Misguided Mantra: 'No Crisis Should Go to Waste' 5/9/2010, 11:31 | |
| Rahm Emanuel's Misguided Mantra: 'No Crisis Should Go to Waste' Senior CorrespondentDuring the heady days after the 2008 election, as Democrats basked in their Wordsworth moment ("Bliss was in that dawn to be alive"), Rahm Emanuel embodied the governing philosophy of the new administration.- Spoiler:
"No crisis should go to waste," Emanuel told the Washington Post for its post-election edition, stressing that he was speaking for himself as an Illinois congressman -- and not Barack Obama. Two weeks later, having been named White House chief of staff, Emanuel gave his mantra the presidential imprimatur as he told a conference of business leaders organized by the Wall Street Journal: "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. . . . Things that we had postponed for too long, that were long-term, are now immediate and must be dealt with. This crisis provides the opportunity for us to do things that you could not do before." Now with the glub-glub economy going down for the third time and almost certainly taking congressional Democrats with it, Emanuel's aphorism about the can-do benefits of a crisis seems more likely to make the Hubris Hall of Fame than the next edition of "Bartlett's Familiar Quotations." At minimum, with the benefit of hindsight, it should be rewritten as "No crisis can fester for two years without dire political consequences."It is no secret that early on the Obama economic team misjudged how high the unemployment rate would soar -- and how intractable the crisis would become. In contrast, Nobel Prize-winning liberal economist Paul Krugman presciently warned in a New York Times column written just after the 2008 election, "Democrats won big last week -- but they won even bigger in 1936, only to see their gains evaporate after the recession of 1937-38. Americans don't expect instant economic results from the incoming administration, but they do expect results, and Democrats' euphoria will be short-lived if they don't deliver an economic recovery."During the transition period in December 2008, the incoming administration warned that the jobless rate (then at 6.5 percent) would jump to 8 percent unless Congress immediately passed a stimulus package. Instead, we got both a stimulus and double-digit unemployment. As White House economic adviser Larry Summers conceded in a July 2009 interview with Politics Daily, when the jobless rate was already at 9.5 percent, "What's noteworthy about this recession is that GNP over the last six months has been only marginally worse than people expected it would be in January, while we are experiencing higher than expected unemployment."Jonathan Alter's recent book, "The Promise: President Obama, Year One," offers the best account so far of the early internal Obama deliberations over how to ward off a deep recession. Read in the light of the current dispiriting outlook, these debates within the economic team give off a whiff of Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm innocence. As Alter tells it, veterans of the Clinton administration would marvel that they were considering $700 billion-$800 billion in stimulus spending when they used to be arguing over $20 billion appropriations.Obama loyalists argue with some justice that the votes were never there in Congress to approve a larger stimulus even if the White House had believed (as economists like Krugman did) that $787 billion was insufficient to jump-start the economy. Getting the legislation past a Senate Republican filibuster required protracted negotiations and compromises with GOP moderates Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine.Perhaps a larger problem than the dollar figure was that the stimulus was never structured to be spent nearly as quickly as the fast-worsening unemployment rate required. As Alter points out, "The president-elect's lack of experience in the bowels of the federal bureaucracy didn't help." Even Obama himself later admitted that "one of the biggest lies in government is the idea of 'shovel-ready' projects."Obama never truly embraced the stimulus bill -- even though the future of his presidency and the Democratic majority in Congress may well have depended on it. Instead of the standard White House ceremony, Obama signed the February 2009 legislation in Denver. The president spoke far too optimistically about "the beginning of the end -- the beginning of what we need to do to create jobs for Americans scrambling in the wake of layoffs." But Obama also burbled about all the economically irrelevant benefits in the bill like building "a newer, smarter electric grid" and the "biggest increase in basic research funding in the long history of America's noble endeavor to better understand our world." (My colleague Jill Lawrence has reached a different and more positive conclusion about the structure and lasting value of the stimulus).Obama has often spoken with frustration about his failure to receive enough credit from either the media or the voters for his long string of landmark legislative victories climaxing with health-care reform. But maybe the president's fatal error was that he saw the 2008 election as a mandate for far-reaching change when, in truth, it was a narrower political rejection of Bush-administration economic and military policies.In 1943, Franklin Roosevelt memorably announced at a press conference that old "Doctor New Deal," an internist, had been supplanted by a new surgeon, "Doctor Win-the-War." With an approval rating hovering around 45 percent, Obama might have done better so far in his presidency if "Doctor Do-Everything" had handed over his scalpel to "Doctor Fix-the-Economy."
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2815 - Government to Deploy Broader Mortgage Aid 5/9/2010, 14:19 | |
| et ca continue...  Government to Deploy Broader Mortgage Aid By NICK TIMIRAOS The Obama administration on Tuesday will launch its most ambitious effort at reducing mortgage balances for homeowners who owe more than their homes are worth. - Spoiler:
Officials say between 500,000 and 1.5 million so-called underwater loans could be modified through the program, the first initiative to target homeowners who are current on their mortgage payments but are at risk of default because they have no equity in their homes. Some experts are warning, however, that the same knots that tied up prior initiatives could do so again. Under the new "short refinance" program, banks and other creditors that write down mortgages to less than the value of the property can essentially hand off the reduced loan to the government. The process involves refinancing borrowers into loans backed by the Federal Housing Administration. While the program puts taxpayers at risk—officials estimate one in five loans in the program could default—the government has set aside $14 billion previously earmarked for housing aid from the Troubled Asset Relief Program to cover losses.The new program, which was announced in March, is starting as the housing market shows signs of renewed trouble and as the Obama administration's signature Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP, falls short of its goals of helping three million homeowners. Half of the 1.3 million borrowers that enrolled in temporary loan modifications have fallen out of HAMP because they didn't qualify. Only one-third has received permanent modifications. The initiative also comes as mortgage rates fall to their lowest levels in more than 50 years. Average rates on 30-year fixed-rate loans dropped to 4.43% last week, down from 4.55% during the previous week, according to a survey published Wednesday by the Mortgage Bankers Association.In Deep: Underwater BorrowersHow are homeowners in your state doing?
- More photos and interactive graphics
One of the biggest dangers facing the housing market is the glut of underwater homeowners who could default if their personal finances or home prices worsen. About 11 million borrowers, or 23% households with a mortgage, were underwater as of June 30, according to CoreLogic Inc. The White House hopes to reach borrowers like Irene Gerloff, 62 years old, who was turned down for a loan modification because she can afford her payments. While she owes $292,000 on her two-bedroom condominium in La Habra, Calif., the property is probably worth less than $200,000. She is worried about what happens in five years, when her "interest-only" loan begins requiring much larger payments. "If things don't improve between now and 2015, I'm going to have to let this house go," said Ms. Gerloff, a secretary.But not every homeowner who is underwater can participate. The bank or investors that own the loan must be willing to write down its value.The administration's plan doesn't target loans held by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee half of the $10 trillion in U.S. first-mortgage debt, to avoid inflicting big upfront losses.Instead, officials hope to reach more loans that were bundled by Wall Street firms and sold to investors as mortgage-backed securities. For more than a year, many of those investors, which include hedge funds and pension funds, have been clamoring for such a program because they have already had to mark down the value of their holdings. "It'll take some really crappy loans out of the marketplace…and replace them with much higher-quality" mortgages, said Scott Simon, a managing director at Pacific Management Investment Co. But that could be hard to do because mortgage servicers, which handle loan payments and decide which loans should be modified, are overwhelmed. And some borrowers might be discouraged from taking part because receiving a principal reduction will show up on their credit score. Moreover, investors may not be able to participate as hoped because certain contracts that govern mortgage securitizations say modifications can only proceed if there is an "imminent" risk that the borrower would default.Reducing balances for borrowers who are current could open mortgage servicers to lawsuits from investors that hold the riskiest slices of bonds. Those investors would be wiped out if balances are greatly reduced. For that reason, "lenders are going to be especially reluctant to do short refinances on folks who are current," says Alan White, an assistant professor at Valparaiso University in Indiana. Officials stress the new program isn't going to be a panacea. But they say that it should give servicers flexibility to modify current loans, and that they are "cautiously optimistic." View Full Image Getty Images Zully Bravo, left, and Alfredo Gonzalez met with a mortgage negotiator in Palm Beach, Fla., late last month."We've heard a lot of positive feedback from servicers and from investment groups to be able to write down" loans, said Vicki Bott, a senior FHA official. Analysts say that the program is most likely to succeed on loans that banks already own in their portfolios. It could also provide investors with a vehicle for getting rid of loans that have been modified and are current again. "It's going to be a 'take out' for modified loans," said Laurie Goodman, a senior managing director at mortgage-bond trader Amherst Securities Group LP in New York.The program must resolve a stubborn problem that has hindered every other modification program: how to deal with second mortgages. The program says second liens must be reduced so that the total mortgage debt is less than 115% of the home's current value. The government will make partial payments for banks to reduce those loans, but banks have been very reluctant to write down seconds that are current.Investors that hold first mortgages are leery of writing down their loans without extinguishing the second because junior-liens are in a first-loss position. On a loan that has a second behind it and is heavily upside-down, "do I take the write-down and effectively pay off the second? I don't think so. That second is worthless," said Vincent Fiorillo, portfolio manager at Doubleline Capital, a Los Angeles-based fixed-income manager. He said the program could work for loans without seconds, though he says it's possible many borrowers will still have too much debt to qualify for an FHA-backed loan.Write to Nick Timiraos at nick.timiraos@wsj.com
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 14:29 | |
| « et ca continue.. »
Évidemment, et pour le plus grand profit des institutions bancaires et financières. En bonne continuité avec l'administration précédente de POTUS BaBush, celle de POTUS Obama s'assure de prolonger la torture de ces citoyens américains qui ont été engloutis par une déréglementation sauvage commencée du temps du POTUS Reagan, apôtre de l'astrologie et de la Thatcher, et qui a atteint son apogée sous la férule du president AWOL!
Dernière édition par Pétard le 5/9/2010, 14:48, édité 1 fois |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 14:43 | |
| bonjour Sylvette  bon dimanche à vous deux |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 14:48 | |
| Merci, vous de meme, Marieden! |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 14:55 | |
| Maybe Arizonans should worry about their white-supremacist problem Un autre son de cloche? It's more than a little ironic, isn't it, that Arizonans will work themselves into a frenzy -- to the point of passing a police-state ordinance like SB1070 -- because of a single case like the murder of border rancher named Robert Krentz, even though the crime is being widely blamed on Mexican drug cartel activity, which is actually a distinct issue largely separate from "illegal immigration". (Indeed, it's not even clear that in fact Krentz's murder came at the hands of Mexicans.) And yet when a white supremacist drives up next to a mixed-race couple and opens fire with a shotgun because of their races, as happened last October, the case is greeted with a yawn. As was the man's arrest this week: >>ICI<< |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 15:18 | |
| Éh! Éh! Éh! Devinez où ont atterri les menteurs qui on fait avaler la couloeuvre Irakienne aux américains crédules?
Je vous le donne en mille!
>>Where are they now? Serial Iraq misinformers find home at Fox<< |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 17:04 | |
| Questionnaire from a Libertarian ( aka Tea Party )
Conservatives only want to go back in time a couple of hundred years, Libertarians ( aka Tea Party ) want to take us back about 100,000 years.
Dumbutt, Texas
Recently a Libertarian questionnaire was spammed (emailed to Hell and back) over the net. I put on my Conservatively Correct pajamas and submitted the form back to the sender. The questions are real, the answers are mine.
Please fill out the form below and return to: lp@@aol.com
What does affirmative action mean to you?
A way for Negroes to get my job.
Do you believe that any particular groups of people are entitled to special privileges. If so, which groups?
White males who built this nation.
Two people apply for the same legal position in a small town law office. One is Caucasian and the other African American. Both graduated from the same class of the same college. Both have impeccable court records and similar job experience. Both left their former jobs on their own in order to move their families to a more rural area.
A) Who do you think will receive the position?
The Negro every time.
B) Do you think that most people are hired because of their job qualities or their race.
Because they are Negroes.
C) Who will receive the job if both were women?
The Negro welfare queen!
If you applied for a job should your race be a factor in the decision to hire you?
No, once they see me at the interview they will know I am white.
If you were the owner of a corporation would your priorities be to hire a person that has the best job skills or would you sacrifice those skills in order to hire someone who would fill a void in the existing ethnic mix of the company?
I don’t hire Negroes, it’s my right as an American and if the federal government says I must, then the fascist Nazi gun grabbing government will see the bad end of my .88 caliper Negro-blow-a-wayer.
Do you think that race should be left out of employment applications?
Yes, all that is needed is a picture; if pictures were required then the Citadel wouldn’t have had the chick problem they did.
Do you think it is fair to hire someone because the company is required by law to fill a quota?
Absolutely not! That’s communism!
Look over your answers. Do you feel this society can achieve equality through affirmative action?
AA is racism. How can we go further with Negroes in charge of anything? Look at Africa for crying out loud, they’re still eating each other!
What is your race and your age?
I’m WHITE and old enough to understand the problem, Negroes.
Do you think you are treated equally in society?
No, Negroes get everything.
Remember, you can skip any questions that you would not like to answer. Thank you for participating!! Don’t forget to add any opinions or information that you feel necessary.
Thank you for having me! And remember, this entire issue is what we Republicans and Libertarians are most about, STATES RIGHTS! This simple concept will correct all the wrongs all the Negroes have heaped upon all of us. STATES RIGHTS YESTERDAY, STATES RIGHTS TODAY, STATES RIGHTS FOREVER!
What is really sad about all this is that I answered these questions in as lunatic a sarcastic mode as I could muster, and then saw most of the same answers (using the code words rather than the real words) all over the net given in all seriousness. And what’s even sadder concerns the largest demographic of the net, the young.
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 19:38 | |
| C'est marrant comme la source de certaines informations (dont nul de saurait douter) est absente...  Pauvre, pauvre canard. |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 19:42 | |
| « C'est marrant comme la source de certaines informations (dont nul de saurait douter) est absente... »
Tout vous échappe, vous, comme d'habitude!
Pas grave, on va préciser pour votre petite perte d'attention:
Please fill out the form below and return to: lp@@aol.com |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 19:57 | |
| Vous allez bien?
Parce que vos doigts au clavier sont incertains...
C'est l'adresse courriel de vos amis du Libertarian Party, la base du Tea Party.
Pas pl...
Vous connaissez pas? Ou il fait trop chaud? |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 19:59 | |
| et
1) vous avez tape 2 fois @@ (alors vos doigts ne vont pas mieux)
2) ca ne donne toujours l'adresse du site ou vous avez copie le... formulaire...
pauvre canard |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:05 | |
| So what?
Le contenu ne vous va pas?
Vous voulez le contenant.
C'est quoi votre problême, réagissez au contenu. Contredisez, argumentez, réfutez, contre-argumentez, re-réfutez, trouvez mieux, n'importe quoi?
Mais demander l'étiquette d'une opinion, c'est n'importe quoi.
C'est quoi demander l'étiquette?
L'opinion d'une moule sur le bord de la plage? |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:08 | |
| Tiens, au fait j'y pense. Madame est libertarienne? |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:20 | |
| je demande seulement d'ou vient ce formulaire, rien d'extraordinaire. POurquoi cette reaction? alors... vous avez l'avez pique sur quel site??? |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:29 | |
| - Pétard a écrit:
- Questionnaire from a Libertarian ( aka Tea Party )
Conservatives only want to go back in time a couple of hundred years, Libertarians ( aka Tea Party ) want to take us back about 100,000 years.
Dumbutt, Texas
Recently a Libertarian questionnaire was spammed (emailed to Hell and back) over the net. I put on my Conservatively Correct pajamas and submitted the form back to the sender. The questions are real, the answers are mine.
Please fill out the form below and return to: lp@@aol.com
What does affirmative action mean to you?
A way for Negroes to get my job.
Do you believe that any particular groups of people are entitled to special privileges. If so, which groups?
White males who built this nation.
Two people apply for the same legal position in a small town law office. One is Caucasian and the other African American. Both graduated from the same class of the same college. Both have impeccable court records and similar job experience. Both left their former jobs on their own in order to move their families to a more rural area.
A) Who do you think will receive the position?
The Negro every time.
B) Do you think that most people are hired because of their job qualities or their race.
Because they are Negroes.
C) Who will receive the job if both were women?
The Negro welfare queen!
If you applied for a job should your race be a factor in the decision to hire you?
No, once they see me at the interview they will know I am white.
If you were the owner of a corporation would your priorities be to hire a person that has the best job skills or would you sacrifice those skills in order to hire someone who would fill a void in the existing ethnic mix of the company?
I don’t hire Negroes, it’s my right as an American and if the federal government says I must, then the fascist Nazi gun grabbing government will see the bad end of my .88 caliper Negro-blow-a-wayer.
Do you think that race should be left out of employment applications?
Yes, all that is needed is a picture; if pictures were required then the Citadel wouldn’t have had the chick problem they did.
Do you think it is fair to hire someone because the company is required by law to fill a quota?
Absolutely not! That’s communism!
Look over your answers. Do you feel this society can achieve equality through affirmative action?
AA is racism. How can we go further with Negroes in charge of anything? Look at Africa for crying out loud, they’re still eating each other!
What is your race and your age?
I’m WHITE and old enough to understand the problem, Negroes.
Do you think you are treated equally in society?
No, Negroes get everything.
Remember, you can skip any questions that you would not like to answer. Thank you for participating!! Don’t forget to add any opinions or information that you feel necessary.
Thank you for having me! And remember, this entire issue is what we Republicans and Libertarians are most about, STATES RIGHTS! This simple concept will correct all the wrongs all the Negroes have heaped upon all of us. STATES RIGHTS YESTERDAY, STATES RIGHTS TODAY, STATES RIGHTS FOREVER!
What is really sad about all this is that I answered these questions in as lunatic a sarcastic mode as I could muster, and then saw most of the same answers (using the code words rather than the real words) all over the net given in all seriousness. And what’s even sadder concerns the largest demographic of the net, the young.
Je me pose une question: si nos messages passent par une sorte de filtre chez forumactif, pourquoi, ce message n'a-t-il pas attire de remontrance? |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:31 | |
| Bon, on spinne là?
Mais qu'est-ce que j'en sais moi, où?
Qu'est-ce que cela a y voir? Parce qu'il est situé au Texas ça vous chicote et vous voulez l'inonder de spambots et autres malfaisants?
C'est une opinion, une OPINION basée sur un questionnaire très simple.
Vous avez un problème de comprenure ou vous utilisez la clé de bras Falafel O'Reilly?
Bon, sérieusement, vous commentez ou vous n'êtes qu'une libertarienne, une des 30% répertoriée sur le net par Wired? |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:33 | |
| « Je me pose une question: si nos messages passent par une sorte de filtre chez forumactif, pourquoi, ce message n'a-t-il pas attire de remontrance? »
J'abandonne...
C'est un gouffre sans fond... |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:36 | |
| Je ne suis aucunement obligee de remplir quoi que ce soit. Vous, en revanche, c'est dommage que vous ne puissiez expliquer d'ou vient ce formulaire. Pas grave Ca vous a pris combien de temps (LP@aol.com ? ) |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:37 | |
| ou, au texas???
Pauvre, pauvre, canard |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:39 | |
| Dommage que le ridicule ne tue pas!
Toujours en attente d'un commentaire sur l'original.
Rien à écrire?
Pourquoi cela ne me surprend pas...
Sans fond, le gouffre, sans fond... |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 5/9/2010, 20:47 | |
| |
| | | | Contenu sponsorisé
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise | |
| |
| | | | | | Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise | |
|
Sujets similaires | |
|
| | Permission de ce forum: | Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
| |
| |
| |
|
