.gif) Les Cohortes Célestes ont le devoir et le regret de vous informer que Libres Propos est entré en sommeil. Ce forum convivial et sympathique reste uniquement accessible en lecture seule. Prenez plaisir à le consulter.
Merci de votre compréhension. |
|
| | Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise |  |
|
+10Shansaa jam Ungern Laogorus EddieCochran OmbreBlanche Le chanoine quantat Zed Biloulou 14 participants | |
| Auteur | Message |
|---|
Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/11/2008, 13:47 | |
| Rappel du premier message :Browse Newspapers by country
http://newsdirectory.com/
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Canada
United States
Oceania
South America
Resources
Breaking News
Business Newspapers
College Newspapers
Media Industry Associations
Metropolitan Daily Press
Searchable Archives
Coffee Break
Television
Broadcast TV Stations
Network News
TV Networks
Additional Research
City Governments
County Governments
Travel Planner
College Locator Browse Magazines by subject
Arts and Entertainment
Automotive
Business
Computer
Culture and Society
Current Issues
Health
Home
Industry Trade Publications
Pets and Animals
Religion
Science
Sports
Travel
. . . more subjects
Magazines by Region
Africa
Asia
Europe
North America
Oceania
South America
More |
| | | |
| Auteur | Message |
|---|
Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 6/9/2010, 16:10 | |
| America's eyes wide shut, McVeigh Okay  There was no religious, political or cultural war after Army hero Timothy McVeigh did in 168 men, women and children in the name Christianity, the NRA, restoring honor and taking back our country from big government tax and spend not religious or white enough Democrats. Just a rogue extremist is all. No ties to anyone or anything. Thankfully someone other than me has taken notice of this over the years. It especially came to my mind after the Muslim Army Captain shot things up at Fort Hood last year. One tenth the carnage, ten times the angst. We’ve Seen This Movie BeforeBy Stanley Fish The formula is simple and foolproof (although those who deploy it so facilely seem to think we are all fools): If the bad act is committed by a member of a group you wish to demonize, attribute it to a community or a religion and not to the individual. But if the bad act is committed by someone whose profile, interests and agendas are uncomfortably close to your own, detach the malefactor from everything that is going on or is in the air (he came from nowhere) and characterize him as a one-off, non-generalizable, sui generis phenomenon.
The only thing more breathtaking than the effrontery of the move is the ease with which so many fall in with it. I guess it’s because both those who perform it and those who eagerly consume it save themselves the trouble of serious thought.
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 7/9/2010, 13:59 | |
| Étrange tout de même. Après la couleur de la peau de leur POTUS actuel et de son second prénom trop arabe, l'immigration illégale préoccupe au plus haut point l'opinion américaine. Bizarre quand même constatant, chiffres à l'appui, que cette immigration illégale et à la baisse, année après année... Encore une balloune à la Faux News ou Braitbart.com?  >>U.S. Unauthorized Immigration Flows Are Down Sharply Since Mid-Decade<< |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 7/9/2010, 14:08 | |
| |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 7/9/2010, 17:02 | |
| - Citation :
- on est oblige de conclure que depuis janvier 2009, environ 16% de la population americaine ont ete atteints d'une crise de racisme foudroyante
Effectivement. Grace à la très efficace désinformation de Faux News et Breitbart.com. Autrefois, ce genre de manipulation engendraient des chemises brunes, maintenant elles engendrent des tealibans... |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 7/9/2010, 20:16 | |
|  Modern medicine is good at staving off death with aggressive interventions—and bad at knowing when to focus, instead, on improving the days that terminal patients have left. >>Letting Go<< |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2867 - Obama's Shrinking Presidence 8/9/2010, 00:21 | |
| Je ne suis apparemment pas la seule a avoir trouve peu flatteuse la photo prise la semaine derniere montrant le POTUS, assez pathetique, assis derriere son bureau, rapetisse par ce grand meuble entierement vide. Qui a pu avoir l'idee de publier ce malheureux cliche? et l'article est de Richard Cohen!!!  (les incontournables attaques contre les Republicains en general et Pres. Bush en particulier avec la non moins repetitive rangaine de l'heritage "bushien" sous lequel ploie le POTUS, adoucissent un discours qui, autrement, pourrait passer pour rebelle... quelle horreur!  ) September 7, 2010 Obama's Shrinking PresidenceBy Richard CohenOne of the unintended results of the redecoration of the Oval Office was the downsizing of Barack Obama. In last week's prime-time address to the nation, the president sat behind a massive and capaciously empty desk, looking somehow smaller than he ever has -- a man physically reduced by sinking polls, a lousy economy and the prospect that his party might lose control of Congress. Behold something we never thought we'd see with Obama: The Incredible Shrinking Presidency....
Dernière édition par Sylvette le 8/9/2010, 00:42, édité 1 fois |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 00:36 | |
| Bon okay, on a compris, shit on Obama...
Remarquez que je suis pas loin d'être d'accord!
Mais la bande d'enfoirés d'en face, les Repu$ ils ont quoi à proposer?
Tuer tout le filet social, continuer d'engranger pour le 1% Club et pourquoi pas réduire le gouvernement fédéral à moins que rien, pour que les requins s'empiffrent?
À part NON, c'est quoi la proposition des Repu$? Le suicide national?
Rien!
Mais Madame veut sa carte de membre... |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 05:09 | |
| Tiens? Un éclair de lucidité?  >>Parties Tied at 46% in Generic Ballot for Congress<<"Social Security Under Assault" How like the Repuglicans, they want to eliminate Social Security but they want to keep the Bush tax cuts for the very rich. "Privatizing" Social Security is the first leg in the Repuglican journey to annihilate sustenance for elderly Americans. Everywhere you look, in America these days, those at the top are getting more money than dirt. CEO's are getting millions even when they're fired, not to mention the exhorbitant annual salaries, while workers are required to take less and less. Tax cuts for the wealthy will not, I repeat will not create jobs, if this piece of Repuglican jibber jabber were true, there would be no unemployment today, given that George Bush cut taxes for the wealthiest Americans way back when he first became the worst president ever! The Repuglicans intend to eliminate the middle class and turn Democracy into a Plutocracy, a society ruled by it's wealthiest members. Don't fall for the political rhetoric the Repuglicans are spouting, they really want to rule rather than govern. >>ICI<< |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2870 - Democrats Fleeing Obamacare 8/9/2010, 11:39 | |
| Democrats Fleeing Obamacare Do any congressional Democrats favor repeal? BY Jeffrey H. AndersonSeptember 7, 2010 10:19 AM Nearly a year ago, former-President Bill Clinton visited Capitol Hill and advised congressional Democrats that the best way to secure their political futures was to pass Obamacare. Speaking to reporters afterward, Clinton said, "I think it is good politics to pass this and to pass it as soon as they can.... The worst thing to do is nothing."- Spoiler:
At the time, some of us argued that this advice was both foolish and counterfactual. Andy Wickersham and I took a long look at the results of the 1994 election, in which the Democrats had, of course, been clobbered in the wake of trying to pass a health care overhaul that Americans didn't want. After analyzing the data, we wrote, "The conclusions are clear, and they defy the notion that the worst thing that Democrats could do is nothing." We concluded, "Democrats did indeed get slaughtered in 1994...but it wasn't because they failed to pass Hillary-care. It was because they tried." Moreover, observing that Obamacare wouldn't really go into effect until 2014 and was therefore very vulnerable to repeal, we asked congressional Democrats, "Are you willing to die charging a hill that may well be retaken in 2010 and 2012 in your absence?"Well, it's good to see that the Democrats have finally, belatedly, come around to our thesis: that those who voted against Obamacare will be on far safer ground in November than those who voted for it. Politico now reports that at least five congressional Democrats who voted against what one of them calls "massive government health care" are running ads touting that fact. Meanwhile, Politico writes, "[I]t appears that no Democratic incumbent – in the House or in the Senate – has run a pro-reform TV ad since April, when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) ran one."
If you think about it, this is really quite incredible: 279 Democrats, House and Senate included, voted for Obamacare, and not one of them has been willing to publicize that fact in a single TV spot over the past four months in the midst of a congressional campaign? Apparently, the only Democrat who's running pro-Obamacare TV ads is President Obama, and he's funding them with your money.
The question now is whether the 34 House Democrats who voted against Obamacare are willing to pledge publicly that they support repeal – and whether their GOP opponents will make them answer that question.
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2871 - 8/9/2010, 11:56 | |
| September 7, 2010 10:09 AM Polls Offer Grim Outlook for Democrats in November Posted by Stephanie Condon A series of polls released today paint a grim picture for Democrats in the upcoming midterm elections. Likely voters surveyed say they favor Republicans over Democrats, and they trust the GOP more to handle issues like the economy. - Spoiler:
In a Washington Post/ABC News poll, 53 percent of likely voters said they would vote for the Republican candidate in their district if the midterm elections were today, while 40 percent would vote for the Democrat. (Worth noting: the two parties are nearly tied when it comes to the preferences of voters overall, not just likely voters.)
Among voters overall, independents -- a critical voting bloc -- say they would support Republican over Democratic candidates in their House districts by a 13-point margin.
And 55 percent of voters overall in the poll said it's more important to have Republicans lead Congress to serve as a check on President Obama's agenda than to have Democrats in control to support Mr. Obama's agenda. Just 39 percent said the opposite.
Meanwhile, a Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll showed voters split, 43 percent to 43 percent, about whether they favored a Republican-controlled Congress or a Democratically-controlled Congress. Likely voters, however, favor a Republican-controlled Congress, 49 percent to 40 percent.
The economic outlook among those surveyed by the Wall Street Journal is pessimistic -- just 26 percent think the economy is going to get better in the next year, down from 47 percent a year earlier. As many as 61 percent say the country is on the wrong track.
A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released today shows that 46 percent of Americans say that Republicans in Congress would do a better job dealing with the economy, compared with 43 percent who say Democrats would do a better job. While the results are within the poll's margin of error, independents favor Republicans on the issue by 51 percent to 32 percent.
CBSNews.com Special Report: Campaign 2010
The Post/ABC poll shows voters favoring Republicans over Democrats on the economy by 43 percent to 39 percent. While it is a small advantage, this is the first time this poll has found Republicans to have any lead on the economy since 2002.
Perceptions about the president do not appear to be helping Democrats. The Wall Street Journal poll puts Mr. Obama's approval rating at 45 percent, with 49 percent disapproving.
The margin is wider in the Post/ABC poll, in which 46 percent of Americans approve of the job of the president is doing, but 52 percent disapprove. Among independents surveyed, 57 percent disapproved of the job Mr. Obama is doing.
The polling outcomes suggest Republicans could very well take control of the House -- something three professors are predicting after running a series of simulations of the elections. Republicans have a 79 percent chance of winning the House, according to Professors Joseph Bafumi of Dartmouth College, Robert Erikson of Columbia University and Christopher Wlezien of Temple University. Their model suggests the most likely scenario is for Democrats to lose 50 seats this November, leaving Republicans with a 229-206 advantage.
Mais bon, le 2 novembre est encore loin, et il ne faut pas se comporter comme Perette! |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 12:12 | |
| - Citation :
- il ne faut pas se comporter comme Perette!
Non! C'est vrai. Faut continuer de dire NON et de se comporter en bon tealiban. Penser, c'est trop dur. Haïr, c'est plus facile... |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2873 - Au sujet du harcelement 8/9/2010, 12:19 | |
| - Pétard a écrit:
-
- Citation :
- il ne faut pas se comporter comme Perette!
Non! C'est vrai. Faut continuer de dire NON et de se comporter en bon tealiban.
Penser, c'est trop dur. Haïr, c'est plus facile...
Ca, c'est du harcelement, Biloulou, vous voyez, pas vos petits mots gentils d'hier! Enfin, je vois ca comme ca, peut-etre pas vous. A chacun sa jauge, d'autant qu'elle tente a etre beaucoup plus elastique lorsqu'on n'est pas celui qui recoit les amabilites. |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 12:26 | |
| ?????
Paranoïa?
UMP: Elle est bizarre Madame! Elle a UN lecteur et elle s'offusque qu'il réagisse... |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 12:55 | |
| More psycho-talk!
Pour les tealibans et tous les ceusses dans leur galère:
>> The Mystery of Barack Obama Continues << |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2876 - La realite des choses au sujet des impots payes par le 1% des plus riches aux Etats Unis 8/9/2010, 13:19 | |
| Le 1% des Americains les plus riches payent 40.42 % des impots releves en 2007 plus que la totalite des 95% les moins riches de la population. Plus qu'avant les reductions d'impots de Pres. Bush.
Reductions d'impots que le POTUS veut ne pas voir reconduites.
July 30, 2009, 2:26 pm
Top 1% Paid More in Federal Income Taxes Than Bottom 95% in ‘07
By CATHERINE RAMPELL
Update | 7:39 p.m. Update | 4:37 p.m. Added some additional data and link in response to reader comments.
The top 1 percent of taxpayers paid 40.42 percent of total federal income taxes in 2007, according to the most recent data from the Internal Revenue Service.
[spoiler]
This represents the second year in a row that the richest 1 percent paid more in federal income taxes than the bottom 95 percent (not, however, the bottom 99 percent). This was noted in a blog post from the Tax Foundation, an organization that promotes lower tax rates.
From the Tax Foundation’s site:
.. |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2877 - 57% in New Jersey Approve of Governor’s Job Performance 8/9/2010, 16:17 | |
| 57% in New Jersey Approve of Governor’s Job Performance Tuesday, September 07, 2010 Most New Jersey voters continue to approve of new Governor Chris Christie's job performance despite the continued finger-pointing over who's to blame for a mix-up that appears to have cost the state $400 million in federal education funds. - Spoiler:
A new Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in New Jersey finds that 57% approve of the job Christie is doing as governor. Forty-three percent (43%) disapprove. This includes 32% who Strongly Approve and 25% who Strongly Disapprove.
Christie’s approval ratings are up slightly from June and mid-April. Just before the former federal prosecutor's inauguration in early January, 57% of voters in the state shared a favorable opinion of him.
Christie has embarked on an aggressive effort to cut the size of government and reduce the tax load on New Jersey residents who now pay the highest property taxes in the country. This has pitted him against the state's powerful public employee unions, including the New Jersey Education Association which represents public school teachers, and against a state legislature which is controlled by Democrats.
Older voters tend to approve of the job the governor is doing more strongly than those who are younger.
Eighty-four percent (84%) of the state's GOP voters and 64% of those not affiliated with either of the major parties approve of Christie's job performance. Sixty-six percent (66%) of New Jersey Democratic voters disapprove.
(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.
The survey of 500 Likely Voters in New Jersey was conducted on August 31, 2010 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 4.5 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.
Forty-nine percent (49%) blame the state's former education commissioner Bret Schundler for the funding blunder, but 33% say Christie is to blame. Christie fired Schundler, whom he had appointed earlier this year, over the incident.
Christie announced today that he will use the month of September to present the state with a number of reforms he wants to see passed before the end of the year. He stated that he will be addressing government ethics, pensions and benefits for public sector workers, ways to retain and attract businesses to the state and changing the public education system.
Only five percent (5%) of all voters in the state rate economic conditions in the country as good or excellent. A solid majority (58%) give the U.S. economy poor marks. Twenty-one percent (21%) feel the economy is getting better, but half (50%) say it’s getting worse.
Sixty-nine percent (69%) of Garden State voters say the United States is in a recession.
New Jersey voters give mixed reviews to their two Democratic U.S. senators, both strong supporters of President Obama's economic agenda.
Forty-five percent (45%) approve of the job Senator Robert Menendez is doing. Slightly more (49%) disapprove of his job performance.
In June, 39% said they would vote to recall Menendez from office if a recall election were held today, while another 39% would vote to let him continue serving the rest of his term through 2012.
Forty-eight percent (48%) approve of how Senator Frank Lautenberg is performing, but just as many (47%) disapprove.
Most Democrats approve of how both men are doing in Congress. The majority of Republicans and unaffiliated voters disapprove.
Neither senator is up for reelection this year.
Barack Obama carried New Jersey with 57% of the vote in November 2008, but voters in the state are now evenly divided over how he is performing as president: 50% approve of the job the president is doing, and 50% disapprove. Still, this is a higher level of approval than Obama earns nationally in the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll.
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 21:40 | |
| |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 21:58 | |
| >>John McCain: Torture Helped al Qaeda Recruit<< Just hours after former VP Dick Cheney defended the use of torture during an interview with Fox News Sunday, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), appearing on CBS' Face the Nation insisted that the use of torture on terrorism suspects violated international law, didn't work, and actually helped al Qaeda recruit additional members. |
| | | | Biloulou
 Nombre de messages : 54566
Localisation : Jardins suspendus sur la Woluwe - Belgique
Date d'inscription : 27/10/2008
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 22:24 | |
| | |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 22:27 | |
| Arrange-toi avec McFrites, mon grand!
Moi tu sais, la torture...
Tant que ça fait bousculer aux portes des bureaux de recrutement d'Al Qaeda, je trouve ça bien efficace.
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 8/9/2010, 22:45 | |
| >>Christine O'Donnell's Crusade Against Masturbation<< Christine O’Donnell, Tea Party candidate for Senate in Delaware, doesn’t want you to masturbate. Back in the 90s, she appeared on MTV to argue for a lust-free youth. And lust-free, O’Donnell clarified, means masturbation-free. |
| | | | EddieCochran
Admin
Nombre de messages : 12768
Age : 64
Localisation : Countat da Nissa
Date d'inscription : 03/11/2008
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 9/9/2010, 00:49 | |
| - Pétard a écrit:
Christine O'Donnell's Crusade Against Masturbation
Christine O’Donnell, Tea Party candidate for Senate in Delaware, doesn’t want you to masturbate. Back in the 90s, she appeared on MTV to argue for a lust-free youth. And lust-free, O’Donnell clarified, means masturbation-free. Vas geins, petite branleuse ! (UMP/GOP/PS : Pas très bandantes ces tisanes parties) | |
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise 9/9/2010, 14:56 | |
| Mission
Accomplished
Who
was / would have been
right?
>>Implications of a Pointless War, But This was $3 Trillion Worth of Pointless War and Tens of Thousands Dead<<
- Citation :
- President George W. Bush tried to make Iraq an invisible, seemingly cost-free war. He refused to attend soldiers’ funerals and hid their returning coffins from the public. So it was fitting that Mr. Obama, who has improved veterans’ health care and made the Pentagon budget more rational, paid tribute to them.
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2885 - Fidel Castro: Cuba's Communism Not Working 9/9/2010, 15:13 | |
| Cela ne va pas plaire a Chavez, va-t-il aller jusqu'a oser dire que Castro est senile? Fidel Castro: Cuba's Communism Not WorkingPublished September 09, 2010Associated PressHAVANA -- Cuba's communist economic model has come in for criticism from an unlikely source: Fidel Castro.- Spoiler:
The revolutionary leader told a visiting American journalist and a U.S.-Cuba policy expert that the island's state-dominated system is in need of change, a rare comment on domestic affairs from a man who has taken pains to steer clear of local issues since illness forced him to step down as president four years ago.The fact that things are not working efficiently on this cash-strapped Caribbean island is hardly news. Fidel's brother Raul, the country's president, has said the same thing repeatedly. But the blunt assessment by the father of Cuba's 1959 revolution is sure to raise eyebrows.Jeffrey Goldberg, a national correspondent for The Atlantic magazine, asked Castro if Cuba's economic system was still worth exporting to other countries, and Castro replied: "The Cuban model doesn't even work for us anymore," Goldberg wrote Wednesday in a post on his Atlantic blog.The Cuban government had no immediate comment on Goldberg's account.Julia Sweig, a Cuba expert at the Washington-based Council on Foreign Relations who accompanied Goldberg on the trip, confirmed the Cuban leader's comment, which he made at a private lunch last week.She told The Associated Press she took the remark to be in line with Raul Castro's call for gradual but widespread reform."It sounded consistent with the general consensus in the country now, up to and including his brother's position," Sweig said.In general, she said she found the 84-year-old Castro to be "relaxed, witty, conversational and quite accessible.""He has a new lease on life, and he is taking advantage of it," Sweig said.Castro stepped down temporarily in July 2006 due to a serious illness that nearly killed him.He resigned permanently two years later, but remains head of the Communist Party. After staying almost entirely out of the spotlight for four years, he re-emerged in July and now speaks frequently about international affairs. He has been warning for weeks of the threat of a nuclear war over Iran.But the ex-president has said very little about Cuba and its politics, perhaps to limit the perception he is stepping on his brother's toes.Goldberg, who traveled to Cuba at Castro's invitation last week to discuss a recent Atlantic article he wrote about Iran's nuclear program, also reported on Tuesday that Castro questioned his own actions during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, including his recommendation to Soviet leaders that they use nuclear weapons against the United States.Even after the fall of the Soviet Union, Cuba has clung to its communist system.The state controls well over 90 percent of the economy, paying workers salaries of about $20 a month in return for free health care and education, and nearly free transportation and housing. At least a portion of every citizen's food needs are sold to them through ration books at heavily subsidized prices.Cuba says much of its suffering is caused by the 48-year-old U.S. trade embargo. The economy has also been slammed by the global economic downturn, a drop in nickel prices and the fallout from three devastating hurricanes that hit in quick succession in 2008. Corruption and inefficiency have exacerbated problems.As president, Raul Castro has instituted a series of limited economic reforms, and has warned Cubans that they need to start working harder and expecting less from the government. But the president has also made it clear he has no desire to depart from Cuba's socialist system or embrace capitalism.  Fidel Castro's interview with Goldberg is the only one he has given to an American journalist since he left office.
|
| | | | Invité
Invité
| | Sujet: 2886 - Rasmussen 9/9/2010, 18:04 | |
| ouffff, apres une timide remontee, le bouchon s'enfonce de plus belle! Mais c'est tout la fote a Bush! Enfin bon, pendant ce temps-la, les Etats Unis boivent la tasse. | Date | Presidential Approval Index | Strongly Approve | Strongly Disapprove | Total Approve | Total Disapprove | | 9/09/2010 | -24 | 23% | 47% | 41% | 58% | | 9/08/2010.......... | -18 | 26% | 44% | 45% | 54% | | 9/07/2010 | -18 | 27% | 45% | 45% | 55% | | 9/06/2010 | -20 | 26% | 46% | 45% | 54% | | 9/05/2010 | -23 | 24% | 47% | 42% | 57% | | 9/04/2010 | -21 | 24% | 45% | 42% | 56% |
|
| | | | Contenu sponsorisé
| | Sujet: Re: Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise | |
| |
| | | | | | Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise | |
|
Sujets similaires | |
|
| | Permission de ce forum: | Vous ne pouvez pas répondre aux sujets dans ce forum
| |
| |
| |
|
