Nouvelles en Langue Anglaise

Ah bon, je m'en serais remise mais tout-de-meme.

Tariq oui oui Tariq, l'idole de Benedicte, c'est ca?

Biloulou a écrit:

Sylvette a écrit:

Ah bon? Vous ne "suivez" plus donc.
Je n'ai pas encore visionner le film de Tsur. Je vais le faire.

Mais si, Sylvette, mais si.... je vous suis très dévoué même !

(C'était juste pour taquiner Tsur, car si son film n'est pas une mise en scène je m'appelle Tariq Ramadan - vous savez, le professeur/docteur ? )

Pkoi tu dis des mechancetées...

Sylvette a écrit:

Tariq oui oui Tariq, l'idole de Benedicte, c'est ca?

C'est ça même.

TSUR a écrit:

Pkoi tu dis des mechancetées...

Bonjour Tsur !

La vérité peut-être méchante à dire... mais encore plus à taire.

Ces belles choses étant dites, ce film sonne à mes yeux comme une mise en scène.
Peut-être une reconstitution fidèle de la réalité - auquel cas il devrait être présenté comme tel - mais une mise en scène quand même.

Un peu comme les cabanes construites moyennant finances par des villageois angolais pour être incendiées par la suite et filmées par les "journalistes" qui finançaient l'opération, et dont les photos innondaient ensuite notre presse pour illustrer les horreurs du pouvoir blanc en Afrique du Sud.
..
(Mais je peux me tromper dans mon interprétation sur le film, bien entendu.)

Mon message a ete efface parce que je n'avais base ma reponse que sur les premieres images.

En fait, et si je crois aussi que c'est une mise-en-scene, c'est une video qui ne pousse pas a la violence.

Il va nous faire une deuxieme depression

Pour Tous et pour Biloulou en particulier


Illustration: Al Gore melting by Alexander Hunter for The Washington Times

PATTERSON: Al Gore's global-warming crusade shrinks

Eco-autocrats are exposed as frauds

By Matt Patterson

The Washington Times
5:23 p.m., Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Poor Al Gore. As if an im- pending divorce and allegations of sexual misconduct from an Oregon masseuse weren't bad enough (he has since been cleared of wrongdoing), the apparent collapse of "cap-and-trade" legislation in the U.S. Senate has driven the former vice president to despair.

.....

But not before it helped Al Gore to earn an Academy Award, a Nobel Peace Prize and an undeserved reputation as a scientific guru. As The Washington Post once noted of Mr. Gore's academic credentials: "For all of Gore's later fascination with science and technology, he often struggled academically in those subjects. The political champion of the natural world received [a] sophomore D in Natural Sciences 6 ... and then got a C-plus in Natural Sciences 118 his senior year."

Je suis impressionné!

Madame en a des lectures! Et pas n'importe lesquelles.

Après la théologie de la prospérité, Madame s'intéresse aux propos du Révérend Moon.

Après Rupert comme gourou, on adopte Sun Myung? Après Faux News on passe au Washington Times...

Demain ce sera L. Ron Hubbard j'imagine...

Ou pourquoi pas Raël?

Il est vrai qu'il faut beaucoup se donner, intellectuellement, pour mériter sa place parmi le 1% des élus et les efforts de Madame en sont un exemple des plus inspirant.

1)

Restons «à-propos»:

Tiens, il etait justement question de Chavez, hier...

New England fishermen flotilla protests today off Obama's vacation island over more fed regulations

August 26, 2010 | [color=#000000]2:04 [color=#000000]am

Recovery Summer Update:

Having successfully shut down an estimated 23,000 American oil drilling jobs off the Gulf Coast, citing possible environmental concerns, the Obama administration is now moving on New England fishermen.

Spoiler:

« Top Democrats are growing markedly more pessimistic about holding the House »

Ils devraient! Les Repubs ont lancé, avec l'aide de leurs alliés dominionistes, les quatre cavaliers de l'Apocalypse à leurs trousses.

Une fois qu'ils auront repris le contrôle de la Maison, ils pourront assurer le 1% Club, fratterie privilégiée dont Madame rêve de faire partie, de la certitude qu'il pourra jouir encore plus longtemps, pour l'éternité probablement, des exemptions d'impôts BaBushiennes qui lui sont si justement méritées. Le déficit sera réglé en un tournemain en abolissant les foodstamps, l'école publique, le Medicare, la police et tous les allégements fiscaux pouvant favoriser la classe moyenne.

Le « Drill, baby, Drill » que même Obama supporte allégrement sera amplifié et les normes gouvernementales éradiquées pour le bien... euuuuh... de... eux?

Après, le «posse» qui anime Madame pourra s'assurer de l'élection présidentielle de la très respectable Sarah Palin ou mieux encore de Newt Gingrich et on assistera à la fin de l'Empire américain...

L'Amérique est au bord du gouffre, les gens du parti chou-chou de Madame lui feront faire un pas en avant!

Bien sur qu'il y a des americains tres bien, et il y en a d'autres plus...potaches qui font dans le registre du bizutage somme toute inoffensif comme dirait Biloulou...



U.S. soldiers face murder charges in deaths of Afghan civilians
Hal Bernton | Seattle Times

last updated: August 25, 2010 09:47:09 PM

Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Wash. — In one of the most serious war crimes cases to emerge from the nine-year war in Afghanistan, five U.S. soldiers from a Stryker brigade in the Army’s 2nd Infantry Division have been charged with murder for allegedly killing three Afghan civilians.

While they were on patrol, the soldiers threw grenades at two of the Afghans and shot them, according to charging documents. The third civilian also was shot, and anyone who dared to report the events was threatened with violence, according to statements made to investigators.

The accused soldiers are with the 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment from Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Tacoma, Wash., Some 3,700 soldiers in the brigade were deployed throughout southern Afghanistan, involved both in combat and in wide-ranging efforts to open schools, train Afghan forces, improve agriculture and take other measures to win the support of civilians.

All five accused soldiers are awaiting court-martial proceedings, and their families have retained civilian attorneys to aid in their defense. If convicted, they face the possibility of life imprisonment or death.

The Seattle Times has reviewed court documents filed by a defense attorney with a U.S. Army magistrate that summarize some of the evidence in the case. The Times also has interviewed attorneys for three of the defendants. The documents provide new insight into how the alleged murder plot may have evolved, but they offer few clues about the soldiers’ motives.

Allegations of drug use

The plot came to the attention of the Army in May, according to court documents. Army officials were investigating an assault on an enlisted man who’d informed on soldiers smoking hashish when an informant told investigators that he'd heard other soldiers talk about civilian killings.

The original murder charges were filed in June. At the request of The Seattle Times, Joint Base Lewis-McChord late Tuesday afternoon released additional charges that have been filed against the five soldiers, including conspiracy to commit murder and, for three of the soldiers, use of a controlled substance.

One of the accused soldiers, Spc. Jeremy Morlock, a 22-year-old from Wasilla, Alaska, had a brutal year in Afghanistan, where he was exposed to four explosions that caused traumatic brain injury, said his attorney, Michael Waddington.

To help him remain in Afghanistan, Morlock was prescribed a cornucopia of drugs that included anti-depressants, muscle relaxants and a sleep drug frequently used by soldiers diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, Waddington said.

There was significant use of hashish and occasional opium use in Morlock's platoon, according to Waddington.

Morlock has played a major role in helping the Army develop the case. He’s given numerous details about his involvement in the killings and also implicated others. Waddington said he’d try to have those statements withdrawn because his client spoke while he was under the influence of the drugs he was taking for his battlefield injuries.

In May, Army medical staff decided to evacuate Morlock because of his head injuries. Shortly before his departure, investigators started questioning him about the civilian killings.

"Our position is that his statements were incoherent, and taken while he was under a cocktail of drugs that shouldn't have been mixed," Waddington said. "What he said is not consistent with other evidence that comes out of the case."

The alleged ringleader

In interviews with Army criminal investigators, several soldiers have portrayed Army Staff Sgt. Calvin Gibbs, 25, of Billings, Mont. as a ringleader. Gibbs, who like Morlock has been charged in all three killings, has denied any involvement.

Gibbs is a veteran of two previous combat tours, one in Afghanistan and a second in Iraq. In the fall, he joined the 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment, part of the 5th Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division that went to Afghanistan in the summer of 2009, to replace a squad leader who’d been injured by an explosion.

Gibbs allegedly boasted about "stuff" he’d gotten away with in Iraq and discussed plans for killing Afghans with a small circle of soldiers, according to statements by other soldiers.

Last December, Gibbs began joking with other soldiers about how easy it would be to "toss a grenade" at Afghan civilians and kill them, according to statements fellow platoon members made to military investigators.

One soldier said it was a stupid idea. Another said he thought that Gibbs was "feeling out the platoon."

Others told investigators that Gibbs eventually turned the talk into action, forming what one called a "kill team" to carry out random executions of Afghans.

The first killing

The first murder allegedly occurred on January 15 during a patrol in the Afghan village of La Mohammed Kalay.

While some soldiers spoke with village elders, Morlock was assigned to security duty at the edge of a poppy field along with Pfc. Andrew Holmes from Boise, Idaho, one of the youngest and least experienced soldiers in the platoon.

Morlock, in his statement cited in court documents, said that an Afghan civilian named Gul Mudin emerged from the field and stopped behind a low wall that separated him from the soldiers. Morlock tossed a grenade that Gibbs had given to him over a wall to kill the man, according to Morlock's statement.

In his statement, Holmes said he then was ordered to fire over the wall. He was unsure whether he hit anyone.

Later that day, Morlock told Holmes that the killing was staged and unnecessary, according to Holmes.

Holmes, who’s charged with Morlock and Gibbs in that killing, also said that Morlock threatened his life if he told anyone.

Holmes' attorney, Daniel Conway, said his client wasn’t involved in the killings or part of the inner circle that plotted crimes.

"We're eager to move forward with this process to show the world that Pfc. Holmes is a good 19-year-old kid with a big heart that was fighting a difficult war," Conway said.

Army prosecutors allege that Spc. Michael Wagnon, of Las Vegas, Nev. was involved with Morlock and Gibbs in the murder of the second Afghan, Marach Agah, in February.

The second killing

Morlock said that Gibbs shot Agah and then placed an AK-47 rifle by the corpse to make it appear to have been an act of self-defense, according to an attorney who’s examined his statement.

Morlock alleges that Wagnon was an accomplice.

However, other soldiers have contradicted Morlock’s statements, according to Colby Vokey, an attorney for Wagnon. Some soldiers have told investigators that they heard shots that might have indicated that the Afghan fired first.

Vokey said his client is innocent and has no knowledge of any murders.

The third killing

In the third killing, Morlock and Gibbs are accused of throwing a grenade at an Afghan named Mullah Adahdad, and then shooting him. Spc. Adam Winfield of Cape Coral, Fla. also is charged in that killing.

Hearings are expected to start later this year.

The joint Army-Air Force base Tuesday also disclosed that charges have been filed against seven other soldiers that include impeding an investigation, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, unlawfully striking another soldier and conspiracy to commit assault and battery.

All the charges made public Tuesday stem from the initial investigation, as well as a related assault on a U.S. soldier, according to an Army official.
:
Col. Harry Tunnell, the commander of the 5th Brigade, interviewed in July, declined to comment on the criminal cases. But he noted that the brigade generated the investigation that led to the criminal charges, which he called “a good comment on how the system is supposed to work."

Passing notes in jail

All the accused soldiers were jailed at Joint Base Lewis-McChord. Several still share a common area and are allowed to talk with each other, provided that they don't mention anything concerning the upcoming trial.

Gibbs and Morlock, however, were locked in separate cells, and aren’t allowed to mingle or communicate with their fellow defendants.

Several weeks ago, Army officials discovered that the two men were exchanging notes. The notes were innocent communications, according to Waddington. Morlock talked about his difficulties reaching his attorney and their shared plight as Army prisoners.

"He said, 'maybe we should go down fighting like soldiers,' " Waddington said.

After Army officials found the notes, they transferred Morlock to a Navy brig in Bremerton, Wash.

(Seattle Times staff researcher David Turim contributed to this report. )

« How Vindictive Is This Administration? »

Très amusant le vidéo présenté par Madame. Il a à peu près la même valeur éditoriale que... disons une envolée lyrique de Keith Olberman sur MSNBC!

Et là, je suis gentil. Je regarde dans ma cour, ce que Madame appréciera, j'espère.

Malheureusement, elle, elle ne fait jamais de même. Pourtant, elle a entre autres un si riche potager avec son Faux News chéri!

2)

==========

Pols Clueless on Ground Zero Mosque

By Nat Hentoff

The angry national debate over Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf's intention to build a mosque two blocks north of the horror of 9/11 at Ground Zero has been further fueled by supporter Nancy Pelosi declaring, "I join those who have called for looking into how ... this opposition to the mosque is being funded."

Spoiler:

« "I join those who have called for looking into how ... this opposition to the mosque is being funded." »

Preuve de plus que Republicains ou Democrates, c'est bonnet blanc, blanc bonnet.

Reste que les Democrates eux, ont un handicap sérieux. Le président est demi-noir et son second prénom est de consonance arabe.

Ça fait grincer des dents l'électorat blanc magistralement manipulé par les campagnes de haine raciste orchestrées par les Faux News et Breitbart.com, les complices de Madame.


Pendant ce temps:

Republican Congressman Mike Pence proved once again that the GOP only has one plan for the economy: No Millionaire Left Behind!

Puisqu'on en est là:

Saudi Royal Backs Imam and Fox News

Évidemment, c'est pas clair tout ça!

Donc, si j'ai bien compris, les Wahabites financent et Faux News et la Mosquée de la Mort question de monter l'esprit fasciste et raciste américain pour prouver aux Musulmans que les ÉU ont vraiment contre eux une haine mortelle et diabolique?

Ce qui me désole c'est voir que la toute innocente et naïve Madame se retrouve complice sans le vouloir de ces abominables islamistes au milieu de cet imbroglio.

La vie est si injuste!

3) 4) et 5)

==========


We laid an American Soldier to rest today. Another American hero lost in Afghanistan. This one was someone I knew and too close to home, once again. Read about him and see photos and videos below.

Captain Kyle Comfort
October 17, 1982 – May 8, 2010
Fire Support Officer
Company D, 3rd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment

Kyle Comfort had just recently been promoted to Captain and been assigned to a Ranger Regiment in the [color:ade1=#000000]Army. His accomplishments as a Soldier, in such a short time, were a testament to the fact that he was an excellent Soldier. Unfortunately, in this war, it doesn’t make a lot of difference how good you are at your job. The difference seems to be left to chance. Where you are sitting in your vehicle or which vehicle you are sitting in when you hit an IED or where you are standing on your FOB when the mortars come in. All chance and circumstance.

It has to be that way. The enemy that is fighting us now could never win a legitimate war with our Soldiers. So they fight as insurgents and use tactics that they know make our Soldiers [color:ade1=#000000]vulnerable.

Spoiler:

Bon, c'est pas amusant, c'est en anglais, mais n'empêche que c'est vrai. Une sorte de dissertation sur l'art de se faire enc...r par l'industrie pétrolière...

Au fait, notre tendre Madame, c'est pas dans le pétrole qu'elle a trouvé ses bijoux?


Big Oil Earns 45 Billion Dollars a Year Virtually Tax Free

Jacqueline Marcus
Buzzflash

Democrats told voters that they would not raise taxes for those who earn less than $200,000 a year. What about those who earn $45 billion dollars a year? Most Americans believe that oil billionaires, logically speaking, have to pay the highest income taxes. Wrong. Big Oil billionaires pay far less taxes than the average working American.

Exxon/Mobil earns $45 billion dollars in profits a year. Guess how much corporate income taxes Exxon/Mobile has to pay from that $45 billion? A pittance.

Big Oil should pay 35 percent of their earnings in federal taxes, but thanks to our oil-friendly congress, they pay a mere 5.3 percent. That’s far less than working Americans have to pay.

You can count on the average American paying much higher taxes than U.S. oil executives that earn billions of dollars a year. So while Kerry and Obama target those who earn $200,000 annually, the oil billionaires get a tax-free pass.

Republican candidates yell and scream about not raising taxes, but they’re not thinking about the Tea-baggers’ taxes; no, they have their bosses in mind, the ones that have them on a tight leash. They owe their souls to the industrial polluting billionaires, Big Oil, which means they’ll do everything in their congressional power to protect Big Oil from paying their fair share of taxes.

That’s how corrupt the system has become over the last decade. The Bush administration broke all records by reducing federal corporate taxes for corporations to its lowest percentage in nearly six decades. (1)

Thus, if you’re a Big Oil billionaire, jackpot! You don’t have to contribute a dime to the country. Well, maybe a dime compared to your earnings, but that’s about all. You don’t have to pay your fair share of taxes for schools, roads, bridges, hospitals, educational grants, social security, Medicare, Medicaid, police, firemen, postal services…you get a free pass! while working Americans carry the largest tax burden on their shoulders, taxes that are, incidentally, being slashed for all the above social services so that they can be given to the Pentagon weapon contractors, Big Oil, and Wall Street bailouts.

Just how far would our congressional members go for campaign contributions? What would they give away to Big Oil in exchange for a pocketful of campaign change? Well, they’ve given away our national forests, our oceans, our public lands, our majestic mountains, our rivers, our lakes, our wildlife—and the final freebie gift in return for campaign contributions: no taxes. Wow! that’s quite a bargain! For a couple hundred thousand, Big Oil can own the entire country.

We, on the other hand, have to pay twice for gasoline taxes: once at the pump and again through Big Oil tax abuse benefits such as subsidies, loopholes, and a little thing you never hear about at political debates: “depletion allowances”.

History lesson: Republican Andrew Mellon, one of the biggest corporate thugs that ever slithered his way inside the White House, was appointed treasury secretary from 1921-1932 for good corporate thievery reasons. Mellon cut taxes, regulation and oversight on corporations, especially Big Oil, and he basically initiated huge depletion allowances which began under President Wilson.

What exactly is a depletion allowance? Example: Big Oil says to the government: “We may be running out of oil in these wells—we haven’t yet, but you’re going to have to pay us anyway by allowing us to deduct from our taxable income. Mellon increased that deduction from 5 percent to 27.5 percent that companies received from their wells, with no limit on the total amount of money that a company could deduct. Mellon also eliminated the antitrust regulations, which led to Big Oil mergers that made a single polluting industry more powerfully wealthy than all the world governments combined. (2)

So much for those monopoly laws…While Mellon increased corporate welfare for the super rich, he reduced government spending for the poor.

Currently, the depletion allowance runs somewhere between 15%-25% of the gross income derived from oil and gas wells from Big Oil’s taxable incomes.

That’s a loss to our country’s national budget of billions a year that could be used to pay down the national deficit. And that’s only one tax scam from many loopholes. Big Oil, for instance, is allowed to deduct up to 70% from taxable income for oil exploration, which comes out of our pockets.

There’s also a tax break known as “enhanced oil recovery credit”. It encourages oil companies to go after reserves that are more expensive to extract—and far more polluting. (3)

Keep in mind that the oil extracted from oceans and federal lands belong to the public. Big Oil gets the oil for free and then sells it back to us for big profits, $45 billion dollars a year profits.

Together, these Big Oil tax benefits exceed the value of the energy produced by that oil. In other words, it would be cheaper for the government to just buy gasoline from the companies and give it to taxpayers free of charge. (4)

The bottom line is that we are essentially losing billions and billions of tax dollars from corporate oil “welfare” tax breaks. If Big Oil paid their fair share of taxes, and if the bloated Pentagon budget was cut by 35%, the national debt would disappear overnight. But what do congressional members target instead?—Social Security, extended unemployment, Medicare, educational funding, in short, our public services.

You will never hear this subject of corporate welfare: Big Oil tax benefits, discussed at national or local political debates or in the mainstream news. By analogy, imagine if we were trapped in a cage that is being lowered into the sea. There’s a TV screen that show pundits talking about the big, bad immigrants, Muslim Mosques, terrorists, Obama’s birth certificate…Everyone starts fighting over these distracting issues, but no one on the TV screen or in the cage bothers to ask why the cage is being lowered and if it can be stopped.

That’s the situation we’re in. The oil tyrants and their government paid-off whores want to keep us occupied and divided with inflammatory arguments while they step out the back door, counting their billions of tax-free dollars.

Sources:

1-2) The Tyranny of Oil; Antonia Juhasz; pages 76-77

3-4) Take the Rich Off Welfare; Zepezauer & Naiman; pages 100-101

Shansaa a écrit:

Bien sur qu'il y a des americains tres bien, et il y en a d'autres plus...potaches qui font dans le registre du bizutage somme toute inoffensif comme dirait Biloulou...

Roooh.... comme vous y allez.... appeler bizutage la mort voulue d'hommes !

Non, Shansaa, faire la guerre et tuer des hommes n'est pas un simple bizutage. Même si les meurtriers sont des hommes confortés par l'esprit de groupe, au jugement dénaturé par des drogues ou - c'est presque la même chose - par des hormones engendrées par un état de stress permanent et de refoulement des actions de survie.
Allez, pour votre punition un petit apéro bien sagement hein ?

(Pour ces actes qui les ont certainement dépassés, ils se trouvent maintenant entre les mains de la justice, n'est-ce pas ? Puisse-t-il en être de même dans tous les pays du monde tant qu'il y aura des guerres et de la violence...)

Charles Krauthammer a encore raison, il suffit de contempler, pantois, la reaction de certains participants qui ne peuvent s'empecher de sous-entendre le racisme comme seule possibilite de motif valable a tout opposant a Obama le bien-aime...

Sur ce fil, on observe meme:

1- un rejet du POTUS 1 an et 1/2 apres qu'il ait ete porte aux nues alors que les resultats de son programme sont un echec complet tant economiquement que politiquement et surtout ethiquement et moralement, et en meme temps, on nous fait comprendre que s'il gouvernait plus a gauche comme il l'avait promis (lorsqu'il faisait ses discours DEVANT ses supporters de gauche, par exemple a San Francisco) tout irait tellement mieux...
On sait a quel point cela est verifiable tous les jours dans les pays communistes.

Pas assez a gauche pour certains? (suivez mon regard) et pourtant quand on lit le message 2621, en particulier:

"They want to close the fisheries into 'commodities markets' where the government essentially licenses fishermen and then allocates the catch based on a predetermined distribution plan. The 'commodities markets' will kill many fishing-based jobs and essentially turn fishermen into government employees, and they’re not happy about it."

on realise que le POTUS n'en est plus a la redistribution des richesses "a la socialiste" mais qu'apres avoir mis main basse sur l'industrie automobile, les assurances, l'education, les services de sante, etc... il continue a appliquer allegrement les valeurs (? ) communistes) .

2- une rage et une hargne demesuree envers toute personne qui avait su lire et comprendre l'inexperience nocive du candidat, combinee a une ideologie d'extreme gauche des plus prejudiciables et des moins souhaitables et souhaitees par la grande majorite des Americains.

Cette attitude non-surprenante a tous les attributs du mauvais perdant, il y en a qui s'y complaise et y font meme carriere. Bien entendu comme le mauvais ouvrier a toujours de mauvais outils, dans ce cas encore, le desastre, c'est la fote aux au-tres.

D'ailleurs, le POTUS apres 1 and 1/2 continue a blamer Pres. Bush.

On oublie un peu facilement que Pres. Bush avait pris le pouvoir en recession economique, apres Clinton, et qu'un choc financier aussi important qu'emotionnel pour les Americains avait presque fait couler l'economie le 11 sept et il l'avait remisesur d'excellents rails.

Evidemment, ils evitent de mentionner le coup de grace donne par Fannie Mae et Freddie Mac dirigees par des Democrates, dont le plus connu est Barney Frank (qui reconnait ENFIN ses erreurs maintenant) et un Congres Democrate qui refusait toute action pour palier aux problemes de ces organismes de pret (la carte du racisme etant la encore employee contre Bush 43), qui ont eu les consequences nationales et mondiales que l'ont sait.

Les media et le POTUS ne savent que repeter l'"etat desastreux dans lequel Pres. Bush a laisse le pays economiquement et qu'en plus, devrais-je dire surtout???, personne ne nous aimait.

The last refuge of a liberal
By Charles Krauthammer

Friday, August 27, 2010

Liberalism under siege is an ugly sight indeed. Just yesterday it was all hope and change and returning power to the people. But the people have proved so disappointing. Their recalcitrance has, in only 19 months, turned the predicted 40-year liberal ascendancy (James Carville) into a full retreat. Ah, the people, the little people, the small-town people, the "bitter" people, as Barack Obama in an unguarded moment once memorably called them, clinging "to guns or religion or" -- this part is less remembered -- "antipathy toward people who aren't like them."

Spoiler:

Madame nous fait une petite crise de victimite?

Le POTUS actuel peut bien blâmer légitimement l'emPOTUS précédent puisqu'il n'y a rien de changé fondamentalement dans les politiques que le syndicat d'enrichissement personnel du crime derrière le second, BaBush, avait instaurées et qui sont toujours au goût du jour. Obama, sert à l'Amérique du BaBush réchauffé aux micro-ondes.

Puisqu'on assiste encore et encore au démantèlement de la constitution américaine au profit du 1% Club, ce club dont l'appartenance comblerait les plus osés fantasmes de Madame, que reste-t-il donc pour comprendre la raison de la haine viscérale que ces libertariens et dominionistes, qui ont holduppé le parti Republicain, portent envers le Président Obama sinon le mépris du noir et la phobie des prénoms arabes?

Dites! Dites!

Madame nous fait une petite crise de victimite?

Ah non, c'est la specialite du canard deplume. Il vole tres disgracieusement mais c'est la fote du vent qui ne le porte pas correctement, savez-vous...

Des excuses, des excuses, toujours des excuses comme celle exployees pour defendre tous ces petits criminels a deux ronds qui brulent les voitures et attaquent les innocents: une pauvre et triste enfance..

Le gouvernement leur doit tout, et quand le gouvernment finit par dire non, on ne peut plus, il y a tout-de-meme une limite, meme au Canada, alors leurs amis doivent prendre la releve, les heberger, les nourrir, leur preter leur ordinateur ; quand meme les amis en ont assez, ils se refugient dans les associations caritatives chretiennes ce qui ne les empechent pas de dedaigner, de mepriser et de critiquer la religion, en quelque sorte mordre la main qui les nourrit.

Ils disent tout et le contraire, tant que le fiel peut couler de leur bouche. Un moment, ils fustigent ceux qui ne pensent pas comme eux, pour, selon eux, propager l'anti-islamisme et quelques heures plus tard, ils denoncent la charia, mais eux... ont le droit s'ils font partie d'une minorite.

Povre, povre, povre canard. Il a du en prendre du plomb dans le .. derriere, a croire qu'il aime ca.

==========

Je crois que nous parvenons a peu pres a la limite acceptee par Saint Pierre. Une remontrance ne devrait pas tarder a se faire, s'il ouvre l'oeil.

Alors, maintenant, petit caneton, je m'arrete, vous imaginez que je pourrais aller bien plus loin. Vous me detestez parce que malgre les coups de la vie, j'ai resiste, je ne suis pas une faible, et ca, c'est, je crois ce qui vous est le plus difficile a accepter.

Mais bon, je dois dire que dans un sens c'est assez flatteur que vous me portiez ainsi tant d'interet, si, si...

Bonne continuation.

Decoding the Mideast peace rhetoric

Both Netanyahu and Abbas accept Clinton's invitation to Washington for a September 3 gathering. Close

By BEN SMITH | 8/26/10 5:40 PM EDT

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last week announced a new round of peace talks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas (known as Abu Mazen) accepted her invitation to Washington for the talks beginning September 2.

Spoiler:

« Mais bon, je dois dire que dans un sens c'est assez flatteur que vous me portiez ainsi tant d'interet, si, si... »

À vous personnellement? Non.

Mais à ce que vous représentez, oui.

C'est que malheureusement ce 1% Club auquel vous voudriez tant appartenir s'accapare tout de même 95% de toutes la richesse non seulement de ce pays qui a eu la délicatesse de vous accueillir mais du reste de la planète et qui espère trouver encore plus à spolier.

Votre appel à St-Pierre est instructif, typique du colonisateur qui implore l'aide de la mère-patrie pour faire taire par la force le colonisé qui ose élever la voix ou prétendre corriger cette vérité distordue que vous propagez comme parole d'évangile. Il est typique aussi, cet appel, de ces libertariens et dominionistes à qui vous avez voué votre âme qui trafiquent les faits et qui, à couvert et ignomineusement, manipulent la masse des Tea-Partyers, ces tealibans et fedayins ignares et incultes qui composent votre armée de croisade.

S'il y en a pour défendre ceux que vous appelez des petits criminels à deux ronds, je ne suis pas de ceux-là. Mais vous Madame, vous défendez des criminels de haut-vol, les poches pleines à craquer de l'argent extorqué à la classe moyenne, qui commettent crimes de guerre et tortures de par la planète en toute impunité, protégés par leur gouvernement exécré mené par un demi-blanc, et qui s'apprêtent à établir une théocratie en Amérique pour le profit exclusif de leurs actionnaires.

En me traitant de canard déplumé, c'est vous Madame qui recourez à l'insulte et qui devrait être ramenée à l'ordre. Mais tous savent qu'il n'en sera rien. St-Pierre est un gentleman, toujours prêt à sauver la belle de l'ire des canards enragés.